https://mega.nz/#F!iIwCkTKB!7-gMe2VmgnuKNfbyTbKCPw
Sorry for late submission, but here it is for download.
Sunday, December 11, 2016
Thursday, November 17, 2016
Tuesday, October 18, 2016
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Collage Series Concept
Collage Series
Concept
The
concept for my series is a historical redux, a take on war by juxtaposing
different sides to various wars and the attitudes expressed by them. I want to
show the difference between firsthand and secondhand war experiences and how
people involved view them. I also am going to use several different wars, in
different times with different styles. The purpose is to show how war doesn’t
change, nor does how people react to it or are affected by it. Though the
weapons may change, the story does not.
As an example, one image I’ve already begun deals
with the Manhattan Project. It should fall somewhere in the middle of my
series. The central image is one of the group of lead scientists in charge of
developing the atom bomb. Scattered around them are actual signs posted where
they researched with sayings such as “Silence Means Security” or “What You See
Here/ What You Hear Here/ What You Do Here/ When You Leave Here/ Let It Stay
Here”. In the background, however, will be scenes of the bombings. Levelled
cityscape, corpses, soldiers running to and fro, any images resembling the real
toll of the war. Attached are some of the images I’m using.
I’m
currently planning on making the first image of the series to represent WWI. I
want to use images of chemical weapons, gas masks, and trenches to isolate
which war it is but at the same time include all the common themes of death,
despair and the like such that without mention of the weaponry and combatants
it would be difficult to tell which war it was.
For the final image of the series, I plan to
envision a future war, one where the weapon of choice is technology. It will be
extremely different from the previous images in that it will be vibrantly
colorful in contrast to the mostly grayscale images of past wars, feature much
more media representation, and have an overarching theme of corruption.
However, the same themes will be present as in the first images to establish
the unchanging nature of war.
Friday, September 16, 2016
Tuesday, September 13, 2016
Thursday, September 8, 2016
9/8/16 - Demo & 3rd Collage
Tuesday, September 6, 2016
Lev Manovich Response
In the excerpt from The Language of New Media, Manovich clearly details how in the postmodern era, artists have been becoming less original and have begun using already existing materials to create new art, using the "logic of selection". While not openly hostile to the concept, he does not seem to be in favor of it, but rather seems to back the idea of romantic creation. I have to disagree. While it is true much of digital art is a "modification of an existing signal", it is not universal. Take for example this piece, being the album art for Everything Everything's Get To Heaven, designed by New Zealand artist Andrew Archer.
The work is entirely digital, however does not take from existing media in any way besides the tools provided. The phrase "modification of an existing signal" would have to stretch pretty thin to accommodate the painstaking process of designing, drawing, and coloring of such a complicated piece. On the contrary, here is a photo of artist Alex Grey painting one of his famous god heads.
The only difference between the two are the method used to create them, but both utilize the same creativity and skill of the artist. If a work of digital art can be called a "modification of existing signal", how is a painting any different? The existing signal in this case is paint rather than a paint tool. Both ideas were synthesized by the creator.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)